Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Chronic Disease

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Kane

Health / Children's Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Kane

Health / Children's Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Kane Children Healthy Weight (Ages 5-17)

Current Value:
52.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (58.4%), Kane has a value of 52.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(58.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (52.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (62.7%).
Prior Value
(62.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Kane Children Obese (Ages 5-17) (95th Percentile)

Current Value:
24.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (20.4%), Kane has a value of 24.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(20.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (24.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.3%).
Prior Value
(16.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Kane Children Overweight (Ages 5-17) (85th Percentile)

36.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Kane has a value of 36.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (36.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (27.6%).
Prior Value
(27.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Kane

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Kane

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Kane Borderline/Pre-Diabetes

Current Value:
7.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (1.0%), Kane has a value of 7.5% which is higher and worse.
IL Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.5%), Kane has a value of 7.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (7.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Kane Diabetes/High Blood Sugar

Current Value:
11.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (10.4%), Kane has a value of 11.1% which is higher and worse.
IL Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.3%), Kane has a value of 11.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (11.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.4%).
Prior Value
(9.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Kane Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:
24.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IL Counties, Kane has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
IL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Illinois counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kane has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IL Value (25.0%), Kane has a value of 24.0% which is lower and better.
IL Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Kane has a value of 24.0%.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (24.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.0%).
Prior Value
(24.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kane value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Kane Hospitalization Rate due to Lower-Extremity Amputation among Patients with Diabetes

8.9
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+ years
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (16.5), Kane has a value of 8.9 which is lower and better.
IL Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (8.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.5).
Prior Value
(10.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kane value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Kane

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Kane

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Kane Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

42.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to IL Counties, Kane has a value of 42.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.3.
IL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 84 Illinois counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kane has a value of 42.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IL Value (39.5), Kane has a value of 42.1 which is higher and worse.
IL Value
(39.5)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (37.6), Kane has a value of 42.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (42.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.0).
Prior Value
(38.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)

County: Kane Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease

59.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to IL Counties, Kane has a value of 59.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 91.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 111.3.
IL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 101 Illinois counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kane has a value of 59.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 98.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 121.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IL Value (80.1), Kane has a value of 59.5 which is lower and better.
IL Value
(80.1)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (90.2), Kane has a value of 59.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (59.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (62.7).
Prior Value
(62.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kane value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (71.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)

County: Kane Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IL Counties, Kane has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.0%.
IL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Illinois counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kane has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IL Value (14.0%), Kane has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
IL Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Kane has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (15.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Kane Ever Told Have High Blood Pressure (HBP)

Current Value:
32.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (30.8%), Kane has a value of 32.3% which is higher and worse.
IL Value
(30.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (37.0%), Kane has a value of 32.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(37.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (32.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (32.2%).
Prior Value
(32.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Kane Ever told Have High Cholesterol (HBC)

Current Value:
29.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (36.2%), Kane has a value of 29.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (29.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (32.6%).
Prior Value
(32.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Kane Heart Disease (Heart Attack, Angina, Coronary Disease)

4.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Kane has a value of 4.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (4.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.9%).
Prior Value
(5.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Kane Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IL Counties, Kane has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
IL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Illinois counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kane has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IL Value (13.0%), Kane has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
IL Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Kane has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (12.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kane value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Kane High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:
32.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to IL Counties, Kane has a value of 32.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.7%.
IL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Illinois counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kane has a value of 32.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,066 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), Kane has a value of 32.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

County: Kane High Cholesterol Prevalence

Current Value:
31.7%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to IL Counties, Kane has a value of 31.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.2%.
IL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 78 Illinois counties.
Compared to the IL Value (31.5%), Kane has a value of 31.7% which is higher and worse.
IL Value
(31.5% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.7%), Kane has a value of 31.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.7% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Kane (31.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (31.6%).
Prior Value
(31.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Kane Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
69.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IL Counties, Kane has a value of 69.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 65.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
IL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Illinois counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kane has a value of 69.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IL Value (66.0%), Kane has a value of 69.0% which is higher and worse.
IL Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Kane has a value of 69.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (69.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (67.0%).
Prior Value
(67.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Kane Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
65.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IL Counties, Kane has a value of 65.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 69.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
IL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Illinois counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kane has a value of 65.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IL Value (66.0%), Kane has a value of 65.0% which is lower and better.
IL Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Kane has a value of 65.0%.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (65.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (65.0%).
Prior Value
(65.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kane value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Kane Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IL Counties, Kane has a value of 21.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
IL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Illinois counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kane has a value of 21.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IL Value (22.0%), Kane has a value of 21.0% which is lower and better.
IL Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Kane has a value of 21.0%.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (21.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20.0%).
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kane value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Kane Stroke

Current Value:

County: Kane Stroke

1.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (3.1%), Kane has a value of 1.8% which is lower and better.
IL Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.7%), Kane has a value of 1.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (1.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.7%).
Prior Value
(1.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Kane Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IL Counties, Kane has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
IL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Illinois counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kane has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IL Value (6.0%), Kane has a value of 6.0%.
IL Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Kane has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kane value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Kane

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Kane

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Kane Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Current Value:
18.5%
(2007-2009)
Compared to:
Compared to IL Counties, Kane has a value of 18.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 13.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.9%.
IL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Illinois counties.
Compared to the US Value (23.4%), Kane has a value of 18.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(23.4% in 2009)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Kane (18.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.6%).
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Kane

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Kane

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Kane No Leisure-time Physical Activity

Current Value:
27.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (23.9%), Kane has a value of 27.7% which is higher and worse.
IL Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.2%), Kane has a value of 27.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (27.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (17.8%).
Prior Value
(17.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Kane

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Kane

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Kane Healthy Weight (BMI 18.5-24.9)

Current Value:
29.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (32.9%), Kane has a value of 29.6% which is lower and worse.
IL Value
(32.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (30.3%), Kane has a value of 29.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(30.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (29.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (32.9%).
Prior Value
(32.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Kane Obese (BMI 30+)

Current Value:

County: Kane Obese (BMI 30+)

31.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (31.6%), Kane has a value of 31.9% which is higher and worse.
IL Value
(31.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (29.0%), Kane has a value of 31.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(29.0% in 2014)
The U.S. value is taken from the 2013 PRC National Health Survey; the methodological approach for the national survey is identical to the approach for the 2014 Community Health Needs Assessment in Kane County.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (31.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (28.5%).
Prior Value
(28.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Kane Overweight (BMI 25+)

Current Value:

County: Kane Overweight (BMI 25+)

67.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (65.0%), Kane has a value of 67.8% which is higher and worse.
IL Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (67.8%), Kane has a value of 67.8%.
US Value
(67.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (67.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (65.6%).
Prior Value
(65.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Kane

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

County: Kane

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

County: Kane Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
10.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IL Counties, Kane has a value of 10.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.1%.
IL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Illinois counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kane has a value of 10.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IL Value (15.7%), Kane has a value of 10.7% which is lower and better.
IL Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.5%), Kane has a value of 10.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (10.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.3%).
Prior Value
(6.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kane value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Kane Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Kane Food Insecurity Rate

10.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IL Counties, Kane has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.2%.
IL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Illinois counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kane has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IL Value (12.0%), Kane has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
IL Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Kane has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (10.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.6%).
Prior Value
(6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kane value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Kane

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Kane

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Kane Access to Exercise Opportunities

Current Value:
92.7%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to IL Counties, Kane has a value of 92.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.4%.
IL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Illinois counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kane has a value of 92.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IL Value (90.6%), Kane has a value of 92.7% which is higher and better.
IL Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Kane has a value of 92.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (92.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (92.4%).
Prior Value
(92.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Kane Food Environment Index

Current Value:

County: Kane Food Environment Index

9.1
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to IL Counties, Kane has a value of 9.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 8.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.6.
IL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Illinois counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kane has a value of 9.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IL Value (8.4), Kane has a value of 9.1 which is higher and better.
IL Value
(8.4)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Kane has a value of 9.1 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (9.1) is greater and better than the previously measured value (9.0).
Prior Value
(9.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kane value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.